There is strong interest within the BitDAO community to have a more diverse and spoken for delegate pool. This early forum post caught some of that sentiment …
[DISCUSSION] Allocate partner voting rights to community delegates
One of the challenges preventing this to occur within BitDAO Governance Phase 1 and state of the Ethereum blockchain are transaction costs.
|Delegate Reimbursement|2022-Q1
I propose that BitDAO reimburse transaction costs occurred to those that delegate their $BIT to a Community Delegate during 2022-Q1.
Additional Parameters
I do believe that there should be some additional parameters surrounding this (IE: required duration of HODL, minimum amount of $BIT to receive this, other thoughts?) and will defer before calling this a “finalized draft”. Also not sure what is feasible from a technical implementation standpoint.
Simple Proposal
This isn’t a complicated or in-depth proposal. I personally would have voted on BIP-5 & BIP-6 but the transaction costs and perceived benefits left me with this looming question …
Does my voice really matter anyway?
This thought is one of the reasons that I didn’t delegate prior to today. Now that I have mostly completed BitDAO Community Delegate / Ambassador onboarding process, submitted my own delegate pitch (link to: forum post / tweet) … I felt that I should proceed with delegating $BIT to yonks.eth (myself).
Cheers,
~~ yonks.eth